Laura's reversed version

hi everybody good early morning~

my new structure would be like:

"So I’m taking the other side towards government censorship. It’s fundamentally bad"

First of all, it’s against freedom of speech.

supported by the Australian internet filtering example.

Secondly, people are entitled to government transparency.

supported by wikileaks of US cable example, including an interview of Assange on TED (a very short vedio clip)

Thirdly, it intrudes into people’s privacy.

supported by an example of Chinese government scaning private Yahoo! email account

Then a one-sentence conclusion.

how's that sound? please let me know :)